Archive | Politics RSS for this section


Are you one of those people who believe Islam should be banned in Australia or protest against Halal Certification on products? Then you should read this.

I recently read an article about a South Australian Dairy Company that pulled its Halal Certification because of a social media backlash from anti-Halal protesters. As a result, they lost a $50,000 supply contract with Emirates Airlines. Are they crazy? They paid a measly $1000-00 annual fee for Halal certification that would have seen their products on the menus of Emirates flights but they pulled it because of Facebook trolls.  This company made a stupid business decision allowing itself to be overrun by ill informed people and bigots with an agenda. It was a simple request by a major client. They weren’t asking for anything illegal or immoral.

Kirallee Smith is the woman at the forefront of the anti-Halal protests and thanks to her, Australian businesses are being pressured to stop the certification and in turn, lose a market share of consumers. Kirallee Smith has her reasons for being an anti-Halal certification activist. She doesn’t want to pay the fees. Other niche companies are gaining a larger market share with Halal Certification. So she launches a Facebook campaign and attracts every bigotted moron under the sun who believe Halal Certification somehow funds terrorist groups. The Australian Crime Commission has found no links to prove that at all.  Despite this, Smith and her followers still believe its an Islamic tax and certification funds terrorism.

What Emirates asked for was vastly less demanding than what Coles and Woolworths want from their suppliers. Maybe Smith should focus on the way the big supermarkets screw farmers than worry about an imaginary “bogey-man’s” tax.

The rise of the anti-Halal movement is directly linked to the rise of anti-Muslim sentiment in Australia that really started after 9/11 and has worsened since. Muslims have been living in Australia since the 1800’s. Halal Certification didn’t start yesterday.

Many companies also have Kosher certification which can cost companies between $550.00 to $2200.00 per annum. Kirallee and her friends don’t seem to be paying much attention to that.

And they shouldn’t either! Having one’s product certified to cater for wider markets is good business practice. First we accuse Muslims of not subscribing to “Aussie values and culture” but then we bitch and complain when a Four’n’Twenty pie carries a badge that allows a Muslim kid to enjoy one with other Aussie kids.

If simply being anti-Halal isn’t enough, we have movements like the Australian Defence League, shock jocks and commentators who’s names won’t be mentioned here,  politicians like George Christensen and the redneck pin up girl, Pauline Hansen suffering relevance deprivation syndrome bleating her way back into politics. All of whom are trying to convince the majority of Australians that Islam should actually be banned from Australia. If they knew anything about our constitution and freedom of religion, they’d realise how illegal their incorrect, banshee-like screeches really are.

Many Australians are following these movements not realising that they are being rather hypocritical at the same time.

So What Does Halal Mean Anyway?

Halal is an Arabic word meaning lawful or permitted. In reference to food, it is the dietary standard, as prescribed in the Qur’an (the Muslim scripture). The opposite of halal is haram, which means unlawful or prohibited. Halal and haram are universal terms that apply to all facets of life. 

All facets of life; Sports, education, arts, transport, banking, careers, money as well as food preparation. In fact just about everything we do in everyday life is considered Halal apart from a few thing

Let’s not include and confuse ourselves with organisations and societies that persecute each other or don’t allow women to go to school or drive cars etc. That’s just blatant radical barbarism using local laws imposed by the likes of the Taliban and ISIS and others and has nothing to do with Islam.

So if Halal applies to all things lawful under Islamic law and applies to all facets of life, if you’re going to boycott Australian companies for their Halal certification and if you believe Islam should be banned from Australia, are you prepared to do the following?

Boycott Cricket Australia and Channel Nine for hosting and broadcasting any cricket match involving Pakistan, Bangladesh or even England (there’s Muslims amongst the poms y’know). Cricket is lawful in countries like Pakistan. In fact, it’s huge!  It’s Halal. It’s lawful.

Boycott the AFL,  Channel Seven and the Collingwood and Richmond Football Club. The AFL use Etihad Stadium and Channel Seven is situated there. You know Etihad? The airline owned by Muslims. Collingwood Football Club are sponsored by Emirates. You know Emirates? The airline owned by Muslims. The Richmond Football Club has Bachar Houli; Australia’s first devout Muslim player. Aussie rules footy, stadiums, aeroplanes and air travel are all Halal.

While we’re at it let’s go for A-League Soccer. Melbourne City Football Club is sponsored by Etihad Airways as well. Let’s boycott them too.

And forget the Olympics and Soccer World Cup. Way too many Muslims sports people and sponsors.

If you live in Victoria, go to work on Melbourne Cup Day. Don’t take the day off. Boycott it. There are too many horses owned by Middle Eastern syndicates and there’s that Green, Black and Red Muslim Airline with their posh marquee wooing the social elite including the Prime Minister’s daughter who is a Spring Carnival Ambassador.

Boycott the Rugby World Cup, the Formula One Grand Prix because Emirates sponsor them too. Rugby and Car Racing is Halal. Lawful under Islamic Law.

Boycott Qantas. They have partnered up with Emirates who have taken over several of their traditional routes.

Boycott McDonalds. Many of their products are Halal Certified. No more kiddies birthday parties because you think Maccas pay an Islamic tax!!!

Boycott all Australian companies doing business in the Middle East.

If you’re anti-Halal, protest against Australian farmers who’s drought affected livelihoods depend on exporting cattle to Indonesia.

Boycott oil. Most of the oil we depend on doesn’t come from the North West shelf. It’s coming from the Persian Gulf. Our manufacturing sector, or what’s left of it depends on crude oil for plastics and other essential products. If we want to ban Islam in Australia or stop buying Vegemite, shouldn’t we stop being customers of the OPEC cartels?

Boycott your cheap holiday to Bali too while you’re there. Although the majority of Balinese people are Hindu, they are part of Indonesia; the world’s largest Muslim nation. So when you pay a sales tax in Bali, you’re giving a portion of it to a nation that’s 85 per cent Muslim.

And lastly, if you believe that Islam clashes with Australian values then boycott all ANZAC Day services pilgrimages to Gallipoli in Turkey. Turkey’s is a Muslim nation who have respected and honoured our war dead for 100 years despite being fierce enemies at the time. They have preserved Gallipoli as a sacred site and despite the anti-Islamic sentiment, Turkey continues to respect and keep a close friendship with Australia that rose from the horror of April 25, 1915. Have a read of Kamal Attaturks dedication to the ANZACs. 

Of course all of these suggestions are outrageous. They are as outrageous as Sharia Law taking over Australian Federal and State laws, changing Australia Day and abolishing Christmas.

Australians need to accept that Islam and the Muslim community who practise it have been part of the Australian multicultural mix for at least 200 years. Australia has lucrative business interests with state owned and private companies owned by Muslims locally and abroad.

Some Australians are committing a double standard by attacking the Muslim community and its faith on one hand and accepting the partnerships with business and iconic cultural events by interests run and operated by Muslims on the other.

You can’t have it both way’s people.







In an interview on Seven’s Sunday Night, John Howard says he was “embarrassed” to decide to go to war in Iraq based on wrong intelligence.

Yes he said “embarrassed”. 600,000 people were killed in that war. He attacked and persecuted whistle blowers who kept telling the US, UK and Australian governments the intelligence was wrong or false. Bush, Blair and Howard cherry picked the data and used it to justify tearing away our civil rights and caused tensions in our community. Cronulla anyone? He, along with Bush and Blair illegally concocted the invasion of Iraq based on a scam. Bin Laden was never there and there were no chemical or nuclear weapons. Embarrassed?? After leaving the nation a bombed out lawless mess, we now ask ourselves why we’re seeing the rise of organisations like ISIL? Really?? Not understanding that is an embarrassment. He’s embarrassed?? Tell that to the tens of thousands of coalition troops and their families devastated by the effects of PTSD, depression, shocking injuries, cancers from nuclear tipped shells or suicide. Embarrassed?? Tell that to hundreds and thousands of dead Iraqis and the millions who have been displaced including those we turn back to sea or lock up on Nauru and Manus Island. Embarrassed?? Only a 1950’s self styled child of Menzies can cause this much damage and say whoops. We’re making the same mistakes again people!


napalm-girl-88f02cbaad205d1edf5f19e683c39e6cb4df9c3c-s6-c30 I was only in primary school in the late 1960s but I have vivid memories of hearing and watching news reports on the Vietnam War on radio and TV. We would tune into the news at half past six and watch front line footage from war correspondents embedded with Australian or American platoons out in the field with the occasional glimpse of North Vietnamese troops firing back.

We’d see footage of burnt out villages and Hueys coming into land to evacuate wounded troops. We would hear crackling telephone lines on the radio as journalists filed their pieces and we’d see the photos in our newspapers.

In those days our access to the media was limited to the radio, four channels on a black and white TV and the newspapers. It was the coverage of that first television war that raised awareness and questioned the government’s reasoning for taking part in the first place.

The TV footage, the sound bites, the newspaper photos gave us a much clearer understanding of the horror of war. This was the first electronic media war and unlike the edited and censored newsreels of World War 2, Vietnam was brought into our homes and we saw it right there in black and white both literally and figuratively speaking.

This led to a groundswell of opposition to the war and sadly, a nasty backlash against those who were involuntarily enlisted and sent there to fight. Nonetheless the media coverage played a very big part in the peace movement’s ultimate success in troops being pulled out in the early 70’s.

Let’s now fast forward to 1982 and the dispute between the United Kingdom and Argentina which led to the Falklands War. This saw the return of heavy censorship by the government, limited access to the media and a major lack of still or moving images from the field. News reports on TV were nothing more than “radiovision” with a map and the photo of a journalist. A total of 907 people were killed in that 75 day conflict and we saw nothing of it. This is despite major improvements in satellite communications.

The only major difference in 1982 was that our TV sets were now in colour. The Falklands War was regarded as the war with the least amount of pictures. The only footage we saw was that released by the british government. For most people, this was a war short-lived. Quick and dirty. But the casualty rates were high. The lack of reporting was not an accident. Margaret Thatcher saw to it that the media must be controlled to avoid any public backlash. Governments saw what happened in Vietnam and never wanted to make the same mistakes again.

It only got worse from there…

In 1990, Iraq, led by Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. This led to the first Gulf War. Looking back on it, one could be forgiven for thinking they were taking part in one huge computer game. The reporting of this war was so sanitised it bordered on surreal. There were no field reporters on the ground embedded with front line troops and all we saw were daily briefings from US Command in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia with a few maps and video footage of smart bombs blowing things up. Oh and there were the burning oil wells. The last footage we saw was a trail of burnt out trucks on a road and that was it.

Then came 9/11 and the Iraq invasion and Afghanistan. For the last twelve years there has been very little in terms of on the spot news coverage from these wars especially by Western news outlets. Tune into any news broadcast and you see nothing. Any footage that has been released has been handpicked by the military media managers. We have seen more real coverage of the Vietnam war with a black and white TV than we have of the Afghanistan war with the information technology we have at our fingertips 24/7. There is nothing wrong with the method of distribution. The issue is the way the content is managed.

So what does this all have to do with compassion?

Australia has always had a proud history of accepting refugees. Post World War 2 refugees from Eastern Europe started the migration boom in the 1950s. In the late 70’s Australia began to take in refugees from Vietnam. “Boat People” arrived in Darwin Harbour and apart from the banshee-like screeches from Bruce Ruxton and the RSL, most people accepted their reasons for seeking asylum because they saw what was happening on TV. Australians were also conscripted to fight there and of course many of our sons, brothers, fathers were getting killed and injured. We accepted the Vietnamese and processed their applications on shore. They were allowed to work and lived in migrant hostels in suburban Australia.

Pauline Hansen’s One Nation won a seat in Parliament in 1996. Her maiden speech to the House of Representatives displayed her nationalist ideologies which struck a chord with a large number of  Australians. Most of whom would have normally voted Liberal or National and to a lesser extent Labor. One Nation ran the immigration and race card and spooked the Liberal National coalition who were losing a share of their traditional voter base especially in Queensland.

Both major parties were quick to condemn Hanson as a racist. Rightly so! However, there reasons were more political than moral.

John Howard acted swiftly to regain his voter base which included Tony Abbott’s establishment of a slush fund,  “Australians for Honest Politics Trust”  to help bankroll the civil cases against One Nation Party and Pauline Hanson.

In August 2003, Hansen was jailed and released in November of that year after the case was quashed. It was enough to end her political career. 

And then came 9/11 during an election year in 2001. John Howard’s political spin doctors couldn’t believe their luck.

Howard’s polls were flagging and he quickly jumped on the fear and hysteria surrounding the 9/11 attacks. From there came the fear of Iraqi boat people fleeing the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein. The ludicrous theory that terrorists could be coming in by boat. Fridge magnets with a national security hotline number, the Tampa incident and the “children overboard” lie.


We have boat people arriving from places like Iraq. We know who Saddam Hussein was, we knew that there was a war in Iraq but the coverage gave us very little in terms of what was happening on the ground. We saw no footage of the kind of destruction and carnage that happens in a war. We’re told by our leaders that the Al Qaeda led by Osama Bin Laden caused 9/11 and as a result, a backlash against Muslims built up to fever pitch.

Under John Howard’s watch we had the Cronulla riots where people who “looked Muslim” were beaten up by paranoid racist flag waving bogans whose anger was fuelled by the rantings of shock jocks like Alan Jones.

Australian troops were fighting in Afghanistan. Unlike Vietnam, our troops are volunteer career soldiers not conscripts like so many were in the 60’s. So none of us are threatened with a call up via a lottery.

The reasons justifying the war changed each week from finding Osama Bin Laden, finding weapons of mass destruction , saving Iraq from Saddam Hussein and saving Afghanistan from the Taliban. All under the so-called War On Terror. And still no footage.

Australia has lost 40 troops in the line of duty in Afghanistan so far. No one knows what the battlefield looks like. We haven’t seen footage of wounded troops being airlifted or villages destroyed and the Afghani people grieving over their dead loved ones.

Osama Bin Laden was captured and killed and we’re told that out of respect for Islam that we don’t see any proof. Yet you can easily access pictures of Muammar Gadafi’s dead body when he was killed in 2011.


The truth is the first casualty of any war and it’s no accident. Without media coverage to inform us we cannot be educated, outraged, informed and have any empathy towards those who are fleeing tyranny.

It makes it so much easier for our political leaders to tell us that boat people are illegally entering Australia when in fact they are not. It makes it easier for our leaders and media commentators to demonise asylum seekers because we can’t see what they are running away from like we have in the past.

Despite the efforts of many hardworking foreign correspondents, the heavily controlled media coverage of war, the xenophobia generated by our political leaders to gain votes has turned us into an ignorant, insular and cruel society that selfishly refuses to share the riches this country has to offer and has ruined Australia’s reputation as an open tolerant society.

This will come back to haunt us.




Tomorrow is ANZAC Day. Tomorrow we will see war veterans, many of whom are in the very senior years marching to remember and commemorate the sacrifices our troops have made in the service of our country. Many of those men and women are too frail to walk but they will be there right around the country, rain hail or shine.

The thought that The Prime Minister will stand at the war memorial, lay a wreath and talk about valor and supreme sacrifices while at the same time he and his Treasurer go about cutting their pensions and health care makes me sick.

How can this “man” look at our war veterans in the eye and say Lest We Forget and scrapping payments to the orphans of soldiers killed in action or not even mention the suicide rates among our returned Afghanistan veterans?

How can this “man” stand there with his hand on his heart and tell his constituents that he cares for everyday Australians and then tell us that WE are a liability and WE must do the heavy lifting while his billionaire mates call for tax free zones, cheap overseas labour and receive rebates and and tax breaks?

How can this “man” point the finger at so called welfare freeloaders when the NSW Premier resigns over lying to a court over receiving bribes, the QLD premier receives a 70,000 dollar pay rise and the so called Human Rights Commissioner receives a 60,000 expenses bonus on top of his 300,000 salary while public servants are losing their jobs and not allowed to talk about it?

How can this “man” and tell us that we must work until we are 70 when he will receive a parliamentary pension of over 300,000 dollars a year for the rest of his life as soon as his term finishes.

I hope that term ends soon but it sickens me to think he will get that lurk after what he is about to do to ordinary working Australians.

How can this “man” tell pensioners they are no longer “sustainable” while he goes and spends billions of dollars on fighter jets to defend a Triple A rated country that’s supposed to be in a budget crisis?

If that were the case we’d be lucky to only be able to afford a couple of Cessnas.

How can this “man” look these elderly people in the eye and then go and break EVERY PROMISE he made during the election?

And they called Julia Gillard a liar!

This “man” has rewritten the book on lying.

To all those who listened to the likes of Alan Jones, Michael Smith, Ray Hadley and Andrew Bolt, to those who took part in “convoys of no confidence”, who took part in public forums at RSL’s and grilled Julia Gillard over her Carbon Tax and to those who stood their chanting “Ditch The Witch” and who voted Liberal, you had every right to do all of the above and you succeeded in getting the government you asked for.

To the Labor Party I say this. Get your shit together once and for all. That’s why this ineffectual little puppet of a “man” is Prime Minister.



Resigning as ALP leader is too good for Kevin Rudd. I think an appropriate penance for him would be to serve for another three years as leader opposite the most unpopular Prime Minister this country has ever elected.

Thanks Kevin. You couldn’t let it go could you. You couldn’t accept the umpires decision back in 2009 when your party saw you were unfit to continue as its leader. You knew you didn’t have the numbers so you didn’t call a spill and it was YOU who resigned and made it look like Julia Gillard knifed you.

Thank you Kevin for not having the testicular fortitude to follow your promises on climate change after sweeping into power in 2007. You had it in the bag. You saved us from the GFC and apologised to the Stolen Generations. You built school buildings despite the bullshit from the LNP. You had the backing of the majority of the Australian public yet you were too gutless to take the ETS to Tony Abbott and call his bluff on a double dissolution.  That’s what real leaders do Kevin regardless of the risks. History would have judged you a hell of a lot better too.

You then took it upon yourself to fight the big miners over a mining tax without consulting your cabinet and stuffed it. You didn’t sell it to the public and the LNP and their mates succeeded in making it look like every first born was going to be slaughtered because of it.

Then you wonder why your party saw fit to remove you. Their mistake was they should have let you fight the 2010 election. Going by your polling we would have had Abbott three years ago and be numbed to the agony by now.

Thank you Kevin for plotting your revenge from day one and sabotaging the 2010 election resulting in the most vicious hung parliament this country has ever seen.

Thank you Kevin for your continuing undermining of the achievements of the Gillard government despite being in minority government. Thank you for prostituting yourself the corrupted Canberra Press Gallery with your leaks and leadership speculation that suffocated the air out of your party’s visionary achievements.

Your messiah-like return may have saved some Labor seats but it only made it worse by changing leaders during an election campaign. If the Julia Gillard led government did get wiped out they should have been given the opportunity to find out. Just like how they should have let you go to 2010.

Thank you Kevin. Your actions from 2010 have now resulted in public schools once again falling behind private schools in funding, no high speed broadband to the home, same sex couples being treated as an abomination, the destruction of the clean energy industry and marine parks.

Thanks Kevin because we now won’t get 12% super contributions from our employers and 12,000 public servants are about to get shafted and that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Thanks Kevin for allowing a cavalcade of right wing nut jobs into the parliament with their xeonphobic and homophobic attitudes who will not hesitate in blurring the lines between religion and the state.

Thanks a lot Kevin for allowing your ego maniacal narcissistic messiah complex to destroy the ALP and relegate them to opposition for years to come.

So to you and your mates who backed you since 2010 I say this.

Tony Abbott did not win this election. You fucked it and you can wear the badge with knowing that your actions played the biggest part in leading the country to the election of the least popular political figure as Prime Minister…


No I’m not a journalist, commentator or politician .. Just one very angry rusted on Labor voter.